R v Carlton [2015] NSWSC 2001
Detention was refused because, despite the gravity of the offence and likely sentence of full-time custody, there were no unacceptable risks identified in the statutory 'bail concerns'; the offender had complied with bail, there was value in continued bail to support his children, and the Crown's prior acquiescence...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Offender: Regina; Respondent: Andrew Julian Carlton
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Detention Application After Verdict, Pending Sentence
- Outcome
- Detention application refused. Bail allowed to continue pending sentence hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Detention Application, Show Cause Offence, Adjournment of Sentence Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Offender
Andrew Julian Carlton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Detention Application After Verdict, Pending Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether detention should be ordered after a guilty verdict for a show cause offence, pending sentence, where bail had been granted and the sentencing adjournment is unusually long
Ratio Decidendi
Detention was refused because, despite the gravity of the offence and likely sentence of full-time custody, there were no unacceptable risks identified in the statutory 'bail concerns'; the offender had complied with bail, there was value in continued bail to support his children, and the Crown's prior acquiescence in both adjournment and bail rendered subsequent detention unfair.
Court Disposition
Detention application refused. Bail allowed to continue pending sentence hearing.
Orders
- Detention application brought by the Crown is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment