Knorr v Radial Timber Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 802

Knorr v Radial Timber Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 802

The application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal the dismissal of an application under s 237 of the Corporations Act was refused because the proposed appeal lacked merit: the criteria for granting leave under s 237 were not satisfied, there was no sufficient doubt in the primary judge's reasoning, and no substantial injustice would follow; the order under appeal was interlocutory, so leave was required but not warranted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal (corporate Proceedings) / Interlocutory Appeal (extension of Time/leave to Appeal)
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'derivative Actions' 'section 237 Corporations Act' 'interlocutory Orders']
['practice and Procedure' 'corporations Law'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'derivative Actions' 'section 237 Corporations Act' 'interlocutory Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal (corporate Proceedings) / Interlocutory Appeal (extension of Time/leave to Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time to seek leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether leave to appeal the dismissal of an application under s 237 of the Corporations Act should be granted' 'Whether the order was interlocutory or final']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal the dismissal of an application under s 237 of the Corporations Act was refused because the proposed appeal lacked merit: the criteria for granting leave under s 237 were not satisfied, there was no sufficient doubt in the primary judge's reasoning, and no substantial injustice would follow; the order under appeal was interlocutory, so leave was required but not warranted.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondents' costs, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement."]