Quirk v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Costs) [2022] FCA 53
Section 329(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) applies to all parties to a proceeding arising under the Act, prohibiting orders for costs against any party unless the party instituted the proceeding vexatiously or without reasonable cause; as the applicants' case arose under the Act, there...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs Following Judgment / Costs Determination Post Judgment
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'wrongful Dismissal' 'adverse Action' 'statutory Interpretation']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs Following Judgment / Costs Determination Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 329 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) prevents the Court from ordering costs against only applicants or all parties' 'Whether the wrongful dismissal claim was a matter arising under the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 329(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) applies to all parties to a proceeding arising under the Act, prohibiting orders for costs against any party unless the party instituted the proceeding vexatiously or without reasonable cause; as the applicants' case arose under the Act, there can be no order for costs against the respondents in the absence of such a finding.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- ['There be no order as to costs in NSD 1344 of 2017.' 'There be no order as to costs in NSD 1027 of 2018.' 'There be no order as to costs in NSD 1028 of 2018.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment