Riddell v R (No 2) [2016] NSWCCA 74
Leave to file the notice of motion was refused as the matters had already been dealt with or were not within the Court's purview; leave to withdraw appeals as to conviction and sentence was granted as there was no discernible prejudice to the Crown, the applicant was unrepresented, and he should not be forced to pursue an appeal against his will.
- Parties
- Applicant: Andrew Riddell; Respondent: Crown; Amicus Curiae: C. Waterstreet
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Motions and Abandonment of Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to file notice of motion refused; leave to withdraw appeals granted
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Withdrawal of Appeal, Leave to File Motion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Riddell
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
C. Waterstreet
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Motions and Abandonment of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to file a notice of motion seeking to re-agitate earlier application and applications for equitable relief; Whether leave is necessary and should be granted to withdraw appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to file the notice of motion was refused as the matters had already been dealt with or were not within the Court's purview; leave to withdraw appeals as to conviction and sentence was granted as there was no discernible prejudice to the Crown, the applicant was unrepresented, and he should not be forced to pursue an appeal against his will.
Court Disposition
Leave to file notice of motion refused; leave to withdraw appeals granted
Orders
- Refuse leave to file notice of motion dated 31 March 2016.
- To the extent necessary, grant the Applicant leave to withdraw his appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment