Soulis v R & A Henry Auto Repairs & Ors (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1109
No questions of law were identified by the plaintiff in any ground of appeal; the proceedings disclosed no reasonable cause of action and were summarily dismissed pursuant to r 13.4(1)(b) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal' 'leave to Appeal' 'question of Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's grounds of appeal articulate questions of law sufficient to ground leave to appeal to the Supreme Court" 'Whether the proceeding discloses any reasonable cause of action' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied to the plaintiff during Tribunal and Appeal Panel hearings']
Ratio Decidendi
No questions of law were identified by the plaintiff in any ground of appeal; the proceedings disclosed no reasonable cause of action and were summarily dismissed pursuant to r 13.4(1)(b) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed.
Orders
- ['The proceedings are dismissed.' 'The notice of motion filed by the plaintiff on 27 April 2022 is dismissed.' 'The question of costs is reserved.' 'Absent agreement, each party is to file, within 7 days, written submissions in relation to the issue of costs, such submissions not to exceed two pages in length.' 'The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment