Vasiliou v Tasiopoulos Lambros & Co [2006] FCA 69

Vasiliou v Tasiopoulos Lambros & Co [2006] FCA 69

All justiciable matters raised have previously been determined by judicial order, and no fresh complaint or evidence justifying review is disclosed; therefore, the application must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Application / Determination of Application for Stay, Discontinuance or Setting Aside of Sequestration Order and Other Relief
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['sequestration Order' 'trustee Removal' 'stay of Proceedings' 'costs']
['bankruptcy'] ['sequestration Order' 'trustee Removal' 'stay of Proceedings' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Determination of Application for Stay, Discontinuance or Setting Aside of Sequestration Order and Other Relief

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the court can stay, discontinue or set aside prior sequestration orders' 'Whether there are grounds to remove the trustee of the bankrupt estate' 'Whether the applicant is entitled to compensation or other relief in relation to his bankruptcy']

Ratio Decidendi

All justiciable matters raised have previously been determined by judicial order, and no fresh complaint or evidence justifying review is disclosed; therefore, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['That the application dated 27 January 2006 be dismissed.' "That the applicant pay the respondents' costs of the application." "That the first respondent's costs of the application be paid out of the bankrupt estate after payment of the costs and expenses of the trustee and all provable debts."]