O'Grady v R [2012] NSWCCA 62
Neither the prosecutor nor the trial judge contravened s 20 Evidence Act or the applicable principles: the prosecutor's statement on 'no innocent explanation' referred to the state of the evidence rather than the accused's silence, and the judge's summing up commented on the absence of explanation in the context of facts peculiarly within the accused’s knowledge, properly instructing the jury on onus, presumption of innocence, and right to silence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['break Enter and Steal' 'aggravated Burglary' 'right to Silence' 'judicial Directions' 'fingerprint Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the prosecutor's comments in closing address constituted a prohibited comment on the accused's failure to give evidence under s 20 Evidence Act 1995" "Whether the trial judge's comments in summing up constituted a misdirection regarding the failure to give evidence/explanation for the fingerprint and palm print"]
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the prosecutor nor the trial judge contravened s 20 Evidence Act or the applicable principles: the prosecutor's statement on 'no innocent explanation' referred to the state of the evidence rather than the accused's silence, and the judge's summing up commented on the absence of explanation in the context of facts peculiarly within the accused’s knowledge, properly instructing the jury on onus, presumption of innocence, and right to silence.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment