Williams v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2009] FCA 223
Mr Mates, in his capacity as union organiser, organised a stoppage of work on 31 July 2006 with intent to coerce Kane Constructions to employ an occupational health and safety labourer, and threatened further stoppages unless compliance was achieved. The conduct was illegitimate within the statutory and industrial framework, thus constituting a contravention of s 43(1) BCII Act by both Mr Mates and the Union. The allegations of unlawful industrial action under s 38 BCII Act were not established as no ban or categorical restriction was imposed directly by the workers or union official.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalty Application / Post Liability Judgment (penalty Pending)
- Outcome
- Contravention of s 43(1) BCII Act established against both respondents. Allegations under s 38 BCII Act dismissed. Penalty and final orders not determined.
- Legal Topics
- ['coercion' 'work Stoppage' 'unlawful Industrial Action' 'health and Safety Representatives' 'stoppage of Work' 'trade Union Conduct' 'dispute Resolution Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Application / Post Liability Judgment (penalty Pending)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Mates organised or threatened to organise a stoppage of work with intent to coerce Kane Constructions to employ or designate an occupational health and safety labourer' 'Whether Mr Mates engaged in unlawful industrial action within the meaning of section 38 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth)' "Whether Mr Mates' conduct was unlawful, illegitimate or unconscionable" 'Liability of the Union for acts of its organiser under the BCII Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Mates, in his capacity as union organiser, organised a stoppage of work on 31 July 2006 with intent to coerce Kane Constructions to employ an occupational health and safety labourer, and threatened further stoppages unless compliance was achieved. The conduct was illegitimate within the statutory and industrial framework, thus constituting a contravention of s 43(1) BCII Act by both Mr Mates and the Union. The allegations of unlawful industrial action under s 38 BCII Act were not established as no ban or categorical restriction was imposed directly by the workers or union official.
Court Disposition
Contravention of s 43(1) BCII Act established against both respondents. Allegations under s 38 BCII Act dismissed. Penalty and final orders not determined.
Orders
- ["Proceeding listed at 10.15 am on 20 March 2009 for hearing parties regarding final orders conformably with the court's reasons." 'Costs reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment