Pillinger v Lees [2024] NSWSC 1067

Pillinger v Lees [2024] NSWSC 1067

Appropriate provision for the plaintiff is $2,750,000 (covering housing and future needs), with most of the burden to be borne by David Pillinger, owing to his lesser financial need and weaker relationship with the deceased, and lesser shares by Gina and Khristine, reflecting their immediate family needs and the values of their respective legacies. Tyrone's entitlement is not to be reduced. Directions were issued for further evidence and submissions on the form of orders to effect provision and costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Interlocutory Orders and Directions Pending Final Orders
Outcome
Interlocutory orders made; directions for evidence and submissions prior to final Family Provision Order.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'incidence of Charge' 'apportionment of Burden' 'provision for Spouse' 'estate Distribution']
['succession Law' 'equity'] ['family Provision' 'incidence of Charge' 'apportionment of Burden' 'provision for Spouse' 'estate Distribution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim / Interlocutory Orders and Directions Pending Final Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether sufficient provision has been made for the plaintiff under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)' 'Quantum and form of provision for the plaintiff as spouse' 'Manner of apportioning burden among beneficiaries']

Ratio Decidendi

Appropriate provision for the plaintiff is $2,750,000 (covering housing and future needs), with most of the burden to be borne by David Pillinger, owing to his lesser financial need and weaker relationship with the deceased, and lesser shares by Gina and Khristine, reflecting their immediate family needs and the values of their respective legacies. Tyrone's entitlement is not to be reduced. Directions were issued for further evidence and submissions on the form of orders to effect provision and costs.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders made; directions for evidence and submissions prior to final Family Provision Order.

Orders

  • ['Parties to file and serve any further evidence and submissions on form of orders and costs by 4:00PM on 13 September 2024.' 'Parties to file and serve any evidence and submissions in reply by 4:00PM on 27 September 2024.' 'Proceedings listed for mention at 9:30AM on Wednesday 2 October 2024 to determine need for...