ANG16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 738

ANG16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 738

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to articulate or identify any appealable error by the Federal Circuit Court or any jurisdictional error by the Tribunal. The Tribunal understood and applied the statutory criteria in ss 36(2)(a) and 36(2)(aa), addressed the appellant's claims, and there was no apparent denial of procedural fairness or failure to comply with required statutory procedures.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'error of Law' 'procedural Fairness' 'refugee Criterion' 'complementary Protection']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'error of Law' 'procedural Fairness' 'refugee Criterion' 'complementary Protection']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant identified any appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court judgment' 'Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made any jurisdictional error' 'Whether the Tribunal applied the correct legal tests for well-founded fear of persecution and real risk of significant harm under ss 36(2)(a) and 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness or comply with statutory procedures in Division 4 of Part 7 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to articulate or identify any appealable error by the Federal Circuit Court or any jurisdictional error by the Tribunal. The Tribunal understood and applied the statutory criteria in ss 36(2)(a) and 36(2)(aa), addressed the appellant's claims, and there was no apparent denial of procedural fairness or failure to comply with required statutory procedures.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal."]