Dunne v Astor Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1716

Dunne v Astor Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1716

The appeal was dismissed because the Federal Court had no power to inquire into Mrs Dunne's complaints: the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) did not permit her to bring a first-instance discrimination proceeding directly in the Federal Court, no basis for relief under s 52 the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) was discernible, and the Court lacked power to deal with her common law contract claim.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 November 1999
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia / Appeal Against Dismissal of Application
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sex Discrimination' 'marital Status Discrimination' 'human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Complaints' 'federal Court Jurisdiction' 'common Law Contract Claim']
['discrimination Law' 'employment Law' 'federal Jurisdiction'] ['sex Discrimination' 'marital Status Discrimination' 'human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Complaints' 'federal Court Jurisdiction' 'common Law Contract Claim']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia / Appeal Against Dismissal of Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Court could hear Mrs Dunne's discrimination complaints against the respondents in the first instance under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)." 'Whether there was a discernible basis for relief under s 52 the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).' "Whether the Federal Court had power to deal with Mrs Dunne's common law oral contract of employment claim."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Federal Court had no power to inquire into Mrs Dunne's complaints: the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) did not permit her to bring a first-instance discrimination proceeding directly in the Federal Court, no basis for relief under s 52 the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) was discernible, and the Court lacked power to deal with her common law contract claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.']