Mitanis, Angelo & Anor v Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 234
The pleading failed to establish a competitive relationship between Pioneer and Delta Directions Pty Ltd necessary under s 4D of the Trade Practices Act 1974. The relationship was one of regulated contractual co-operation rather than competition. Consequently, the cause of action based on exclusionary provisions cannot stand, and leave to amend paragraphs 51 to 70 of the statement of claim is refused and those paragraphs are struck out.
- Parties
- Applicant: Angelo Mitanis; Applicant: Helen Mitanis; First Respondent: Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Delta Directions Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Stan Dadalias; Fourth Respondent: Peter Metaxas; Fifth Respondent: Keith Septimus Murfet; Sixth Respondent: Tom Tiesi; Seventh Respondent: Athanasios Topouzias; Eighth Respondent: Giuseppe Messina; Ninth Respondent: Pasquale Morlacci; Tenth Respondent: Jim Zoitos; Eleventh Respondent: James Leslie Maggs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Amend Statement of Claim/strike Out Pleadings / Interlocutory Order Reasoning
- Outcome
- Leave to amend further paragraphs 51 to 70 refused; paragraphs struck out. Leave granted to amend paragraphs 1 to 50 and 71 to 82. Applicants to pay respondents' taxed costs forthwith.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusionary Provisions, Pleadings, Competitive Relationship, Breach of Contract, Removal of Director, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Strike Out Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angelo Mitanis
Applicant
Helen Mitanis
Applicant
Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Delta Directions Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Stan Dadalias
Third Respondent
Peter Metaxas
Fourth Respondent
Keith Septimus Murfet
Fifth Respondent
Tom Tiesi
Sixth Respondent
Athanasios Topouzias
Seventh Respondent
Giuseppe Messina
Eighth Respondent
Pasquale Morlacci
Ninth Respondent
Jim Zoitos
Tenth Respondent
James Leslie Maggs
Eleventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Amend Statement of Claim/strike Out Pleadings / Interlocutory Order Reasoning
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statement of claim properly pleads material facts to support a cause of action under s 45(2) Trade Practices Act 1974
- 2 Whether Pioneer and Delta Directions Pty Ltd were in competition in relation to the acquisition of cartage services as required by s 4D Trade Practices Act 1974
- 3 Whether leave to amend paragraphs 51 to 70 of the statement of claim should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The pleading failed to establish a competitive relationship between Pioneer and Delta Directions Pty Ltd necessary under s 4D of the Trade Practices Act 1974. The relationship was one of regulated contractual co-operation rather than competition. Consequently, the cause of action based on exclusionary provisions cannot stand, and leave to amend paragraphs 51 to 70 of the statement of claim is refused and those paragraphs are struck out.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend further paragraphs 51 to 70 refused; paragraphs struck out. Leave granted to amend paragraphs 1 to 50 and 71 to 82. Applicants to pay respondents' taxed costs forthwith.
Orders
- Applicants have leave to amend further paragraphs 1 to 50 and 71 to 82 of statement of claim.
- Leave refused for applicants to amend paragraphs 51 to 70 of statement of claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment