Anglican Community Services v Fairfield City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1160
The parties reached agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for approval of the modification application on agreed conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the applicant was the same entity as the original consent holder, the limited works meant the modified development was substantially the same development, notification requirements had been satisfied with no submissions received, an updated BASIX certificate and qualified designer statement were provided, and relevant matters under s 4.15(1) and the reasons for the original consent were considered. The Court...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Grant of a Modification Application Subject to Conditions / Final Orders Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Modification Application No. MA15.3/2019 approved; Development Consent No. DA15.1/2019 modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'residential Flat Building and Boarding House' 'air Conditioning Units']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Grant of a Modification Application Subject to Conditions / Final Orders Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend Modification Application No. MA15.3/2019 to rely on amended plans and documents.' 'Whether Modification Application No. MA15.3/2019 should be approved under s 4.56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' "Whether the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979."]
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for approval of the modification application on agreed conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the applicant was the same entity as the original consent holder, the limited works meant the modified development was substantially the same development, notification requirements had been satisfied with no submissions received, an updated BASIX certificate and qualified designer statement were provided, and relevant matters under s 4.15(1) and the reasons for the original consent were considered. The Court...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Modification Application No. MA15.3/2019 approved; Development Consent No. DA15.1/2019 modified.
Orders
- ["Pursuant to s 113 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, the Applicant is granted leave to amend Modification Application No. MA15.3/2019 to rely upon the amended plans and documents which are referenced in Condition 1 of Annexure 'A'." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Pursuant to s 4.56 of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment