Angus Development (Winda Woppa) Pty Ltd v Great Lakes Council [2005] NSWLEC 724

Angus Development (Winda Woppa) Pty Ltd v Great Lakes Council [2005] NSWLEC 724

The Court held that the subdivision proposal was not likely to have a significant effect on the Hawks Nest and Tea Gardens koala population or its habitat for the purposes of s 5A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, because the site was a low frequency use area and proposed mitigation measures would retain and replace habitat, provide corridors, refuge poles and koala-friendly fencing. A species impact statement was therefore not required. With amended conditions, the two consents achieved an appropriate balance between protection of koala habitat and the orderly and economic residential development permitted by the zoning, while rear access impacts were insufficient to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeals Concerning Refusal of a Development Application and Modification of Development Consent / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Appeals upheld.
Legal Topics
['development Consent for Residential Subdivision' 'koala Habitat and Endangered Population' 'species Impact Statement' 'ecologically Sustainable Development' 'precautionary Principle' 'rear Access to Allotments' 'section 88 B Instruments']
['environmental Planning and Assessment' 'land and Environment' 'threatened Species Conservation'] ['development Consent for Residential Subdivision' 'koala Habitat and Endangered Population' 'species Impact Statement' 'ecologically Sustainable Development' 'precautionary Principle' 'rear Access to Allotments' 'section 88 B Instruments']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeals Concerning Refusal of a Development Application and Modification of Development Consent / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether development application No. 388/2005 for subdivision of Lot 15 DP 115582 required a species impact statement under s 78A(8)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the proposed subdivision, with likely subsequent dwelling development, would adversely affect the local endangered koala population and its habitat.' 'Whether Conditions 5 and 21 of development consent No. 388/2004 should be deleted, amended or replaced, including requirements for koala habitat corridors and rear access.' 'Whether mitigation measures would provide an acceptable balance between habitat protection and residential development permitted by the zoning.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the subdivision proposal was not likely to have a significant effect on the Hawks Nest and Tea Gardens koala population or its habitat for the purposes of s 5A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, because the site was a low frequency use area and proposed mitigation measures would retain and replace habitat, provide corridors, refuge poles and koala-friendly fencing. A species impact statement was therefore not required. With amended conditions, the two consents achieved an appropriate balance between protection of koala habitat and the orderly and economic residential development permitted by the zoning, while rear access impacts were insufficient to...

Court Disposition

Appeals upheld.

Orders

  • ['The appeals are upheld.' 'Development application No. 388/2005 for the subdivision of Lot 15 DP115582, No. 5 The Anchorage, Winda Woppa, into two lots is determined by the granting of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A hereto.' 'Development consent No. 388/2004 for the subdivision of Lot 1...