Dang v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 27
The Tribunal's failure to expressly draw the applicant's attention to cl 7(2) of Direction 110 did not cause practical injustice as the applicant was on sufficient notice of the relevant change and had opportunity to address all pertinent issues; therefore, no denial of procedural fairness occurred.
- Parties
- Applicant: Anh Tuan Dang; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Visa Cancellation, Procedural Fairness, Ministerial Direction No. 110, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anh Tuan Dang
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal's failure to expressly bring the change in cl 7(2) of Ministerial Direction No. 110 to the applicant's attention constituted a denial of procedural fairness
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's failure to expressly draw the applicant's attention to cl 7(2) of Direction 110 did not cause practical injustice as the applicant was on sufficient notice of the relevant change and had opportunity to address all pertinent issues; therefore, no denial of procedural fairness occurred.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The Applicant's application for an extension of time to lodge an application for the review of a migration decision is granted.
- The Applicant's Amended Originating Application for review of a migration decision is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment