Briones, Anica v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 976

Briones, Anica v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 976

The Tribunal's conclusions that people who had previously threatened the applicant had ceased to be interested in her, that the earlier threats had not resulted in physical harm, and that her claim of being unable to find employment lacked credibility were findings of fact legally open on the material. No arguable legal error by the Refugee Review Tribunal was identified, so the Court could not intervene.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 August 1998
Procedural Posture
Immigration Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Application
Outcome
The application is dismissed and the applicant is to pay the respondent's costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'convention Reasons' 'political Opinion Persecution' 'judicial Review']
['immigration' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'convention Reasons' 'political Opinion Persecution' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Immigration Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal made a legal error in refusing to disturb the delegate's refusal of a protection visa." "Whether the Tribunal's findings that there was no real chance of persecution in the Philippines for Convention reasons and that the applicant's employment claim lacked credibility were legally open."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's conclusions that people who had previously threatened the applicant had ceased to be interested in her, that the earlier threats had not resulted in physical harm, and that her claim of being unable to find employment lacked credibility were findings of fact legally open on the material. No arguable legal error by the Refugee Review Tribunal was identified, so the Court could not intervene.

Court Disposition

The application is dismissed and the applicant is to pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs."]