Animax Pty LImited v Simlogic Pty Limited & Bohemia Interactive Australia Pty Limited, [2009] NSWDC 213
The without prejudice letter was inadmissible because it merely showed that in May 2008 an offer to settle proceedings was made on certain terms; those terms did not qualify or contradict the open letter written about two months later, and there was no issue in the case concerning the contents of MFI 1 or any risk that the court would be misled as to the existence or contents of that excluded communication.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Objection to Tender of Without Prejudice Letter
- Outcome
- Tender rejected
- Legal Topics
- ['without Prejudice Communications' 'settlement Negotiations' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw) S 131(2)(g)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Objection to Tender of Without Prejudice Letter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a letter headed "Without Prejudice save as to costs" was inadmissible under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 131(1).' 'Whether the exception in Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 131(2)(g) applied because the court was likely to be misled unless the letter was admitted to contradict or qualify an open letter already in evidence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The without prejudice letter was inadmissible because it merely showed that in May 2008 an offer to settle proceedings was made on certain terms; those terms did not qualify or contradict the open letter written about two months later, and there was no issue in the case concerning the contents of MFI 1 or any risk that the court would be misled as to the existence or contents of that excluded communication.
Court Disposition
Tender rejected
Orders
- ['The tender of the letter was rejected.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment