Liang v Wincrest Group Pty Limited [2017] NSWCATCD 79

Liang v Wincrest Group Pty Limited [2017] NSWCATCD 79

The Application was dismissed due to a complete absence of evidence, lack of coherent statement outlining the legal basis for claims, and failure to comply with Tribunal directions to provide necessary materials and explanation.

Parties
Applicant: Ann Liang; Respondent: Wincrest Group Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 September 2017
Procedural Posture
Application / Decision After Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Contract Disputes, Overcharging Allegations, Delay Claims
Consumer Law Commercial Law Contract Disputes Overcharging Allegations Delay Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann Liang

Applicant

Wincrest Group Pty Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Decision After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant was overcharged under the contract
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant was entitled to credits and refunds
  3. 3 Whether the Applicant provided sufficient evidence for claims

Ratio Decidendi

The Application was dismissed due to a complete absence of evidence, lack of coherent statement outlining the legal basis for claims, and failure to comply with Tribunal directions to provide necessary materials and explanation.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Separate orders for submissions as to costs and Respondent's Cross-Application