ANN15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 246
The relevant information – the electoral success of the UNP and the election of President Sirisena as part of a UNP coalition – was about the status of the UNP as a party, not specifically about President Sirisena or the appellant. Therefore, under s 424A(3)(a), there was no obligation to provide written particulars of this information to the appellant under s 424A(1). Consequently, the Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Decision on Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 424 A']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Decision on Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to comply with s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in respect of information concerning the election of President Sirisena as part of a UNP coalition' 'Whether the relevant information fell within the exception in s 424A(3)(a)']
Ratio Decidendi
The relevant information – the electoral success of the UNP and the election of President Sirisena as part of a UNP coalition – was about the status of the UNP as a party, not specifically about President Sirisena or the appellant. Therefore, under s 424A(3)(a), there was no obligation to provide written particulars of this information to the appellant under s 424A(1). Consequently, the Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment