Regina v Centraco [2005] NSWCCA 11

Regina v Centraco [2005] NSWCCA 11

The statutory declaration was admissible as evidence relevant to all counts, its probative value outweighed potential prejudice, jury directions were adequate, and no impermissible tendency or consciousness of guilt reasoning occurred.

Parties
Appellant: Anna Maria Centraco; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Obtaining Money by Deception, Admissibility of Evidence, Jury Directions
Criminal Law Obtaining Money by Deception Admissibility of Evidence Jury Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anna Maria Centraco

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Admissibility of evidence of appellant's acknowledgment of debt to employer
  2. 2 Adequacy of directions to the jury about evidence
  3. 3 Whether evidence was improperly used as tendency or consciousness of guilt evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory declaration was admissible as evidence relevant to all counts, its probative value outweighed potential prejudice, jury directions were adequate, and no impermissible tendency or consciousness of guilt reasoning occurred.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appellant to be taken into custody to serve the sentences imposed upon her