Davis v The Owners – Strata Plan No 63429 [2017] NSWCATCD 7
The Tribunal found that the glass sliding doors, tracks, and related elements to Lot 18 are common property under the strata plan, for which the Owners Corporation is responsible for maintenance and repair under section 62 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996. The evidence did not support that the appellant's renovations caused or contributed to the water ingress. The Tribunal preferred the appellant's engineering evidence over the respondent's. Accordingly, the Adjudicator's orders dismissing the application were revoked, and the Owners Corporation was ordered to carry out all repairs necessary to prevent water ingress into the main bedroom of Lot 18.
- Parties
- Appellant: Anne Davis; Respondent: Owners Corporation SP63429
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Adjudicator's orders set aside and substituted.
- Legal Topics
- Common Property, Repairs and Maintenance, Procedural Fairness, Strata Schemes, Owners Corporation Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anne Davis
Appellant
Owners Corporation SP63429
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the glass sliding doors and tracks to Lot 18 are common property for which the Owners Corporation is responsible for maintenance and repair
- 2 Whether the appellant's renovations in 2010 caused or contributed to the water ingress problem
- 3 Whether procedural fairness was denied by the Adjudicator allowing submissions in reply by the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the glass sliding doors, tracks, and related elements to Lot 18 are common property under the strata plan, for which the Owners Corporation is responsible for maintenance and repair under section 62 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996. The evidence did not support that the appellant's renovations caused or contributed to the water ingress. The Tribunal preferred the appellant's engineering evidence over the respondent's. Accordingly, the Adjudicator's orders dismissing the application were revoked, and the Owners Corporation was ordered to carry out all repairs necessary to prevent water ingress into the main bedroom of Lot 18.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Adjudicator's orders set aside and substituted.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The Adjudicator's orders of 21 April 2016 dismissing the appellant's application are revoked.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment