Andrews v Andrews & Bresabyss Pty Ltd t/as BP Five Dock [2001] NSWCA 62
The trial judge was entitled to find that parking vehicles on the very slight incline with the parking gear properly engaged was a relatively safe system of work, that the injury was caused by the appellant's negligent failure to engage the parking gear properly rather than by any breach by the company, and that the father was not contributorily negligent. No reason was demonstrated to disturb the assessment of non-economic loss.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Negligence Appeal Arising From Motor Vehicle Injury at Workplace / Appeal From District Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['safe System of Work' 'contributory Negligence' 'contribution Between Tortfeasors' 'non Economic Loss Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Negligence Appeal Arising From Motor Vehicle Injury at Workplace / Appeal From District Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was the father contributorily negligent?' 'Is the son entitled to an indemnity or contribution from the company?' 'Should the damages awarded for non-economic loss be reduced?']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to find that parking vehicles on the very slight incline with the parking gear properly engaged was a relatively safe system of work, that the injury was caused by the appellant's negligent failure to engage the parking gear properly rather than by any breach by the company, and that the father was not contributorily negligent. No reason was demonstrated to disturb the assessment of non-economic loss.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment