Cosco v Leichhardt Council [2015] NSWLEC 1200

The Court, being satisfied that the agreement reached under s 34(3) was one it could have made, was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 03 June 2015
Procedural Posture: Development Application Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Outcome: Orders made giving effect to agreement between parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Legal Topics: ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties']

['planning and Environment'] ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Development Application Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether agreement reached between parties can be disposed by the Court under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court, being satisfied that the agreement reached under s 34(3) was one it could have made, was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.

Court Disposition

Orders made giving effect to agreement between parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Orders

["Final orders made in accordance with the parties' agreement."]