Anthony De Lisle Venn v Elcom Collieries Pty Ltd [2006] NSWDC 60
The defendant's remediation works and communications, including the draft deeds of release and the discovered internal letter, did not constitute a confirmation or acknowledgement under s 54 of the Limitation Act 1969; thus, Mr Venn's claim for damage sustained before 18 April 1995 was statute barred.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Anthony De Lisle Venn; Defendant: Elcom Collieries Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for damage sustained before 18 April 1995 is statute barred (subject to any claim under s 55 of the Limitation Act).
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Nuisance, Trespass, Limitation Periods, Acknowledgement of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony De Lisle Venn
Plaintiff
Elcom Collieries Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether work performed in 1996 constituted a 'payment' under s 54 of the Limitation Act 1969 so as to extend the limitation period
- 2 Whether either of the draft deeds of release was an 'acknowledgement' under s 54 of the Limitation Act 1969
- 3 Whether a letter dated 3 July 1998 constituted an 'acknowledgement' under s 54 of the Limitation Act 1969
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's remediation works and communications, including the draft deeds of release and the discovered internal letter, did not constitute a confirmation or acknowledgement under s 54 of the Limitation Act 1969; thus, Mr Venn's claim for damage sustained before 18 April 1995 was statute barred.
Court Disposition
Claim for damage sustained before 18 April 1995 is statute barred (subject to any claim under s 55 of the Limitation Act).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment