R v Death [2019] NSWDC 682

R v Death [2019] NSWDC 682

The evidence did not exclude a reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence. The complainant's account was inconsistent and unreliable, and the injuries were also consistent with the appellant's version. The standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not met; therefore, the conviction cannot stand.

Parties
Appellant: Anthony Death; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 October 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction (local Court to District Court)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; not guilty verdict entered
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Domestic Violence
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Domestic Violence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Death

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction (local Court to District Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for assault occasioning actual bodily harm domestic violence related should be upheld or set aside
  2. 2 Whether the evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not exclude a reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence. The complainant's account was inconsistent and unreliable, and the injuries were also consistent with the appellant's version. The standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not met; therefore, the conviction cannot stand.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; not guilty verdict entered

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The appellant is found not guilty.