VAN DONSELAAR v CENTRAL COAST GRAMMAR SCHOOL LTD [2003] NSWCA 241

VAN DONSELAAR v CENTRAL COAST GRAMMAR SCHOOL LTD [2003] NSWCA 241

The risk of the appellant falling while using crutches on the stairs was real but not of high magnitude, and the School's response of offering assistance, including studying in the library and help carrying books, was sufficient. The appellant, aged 16 years and 10 months, had declined assistance and there was nothing to indicate to the School that he was not managing. The appellant also failed to establish that the absence of handrails was negligent or causative of the accident.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Negligence Claim / Appeal From District Court Verdict in Favour of the Respondent
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['school Injury' 'duty of Care' 'breach of Duty' 'magnitude of Risk' 'stairs' 'crutches' 'handrails']
['torts' 'negligence' 'personal Injury'] ['school Injury' 'duty of Care' 'breach of Duty' 'magnitude of Risk' 'stairs' 'crutches' 'handrails']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Negligence Claim / Appeal From District Court Verdict in Favour of the Respondent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the School breached its duty of care by permitting the appellant to move between classes where he had to negotiate steps while on crutches.' 'Whether the School was required to ensure assistance for the appellant with carrying books or accompanying him while moving around the campus.' 'Whether the School was negligent in failing to provide handrails on the flight of stairs.']

Ratio Decidendi

The risk of the appellant falling while using crutches on the stairs was real but not of high magnitude, and the School's response of offering assistance, including studying in the library and help carrying books, was sufficient. The appellant, aged 16 years and 10 months, had declined assistance and there was nothing to indicate to the School that he was not managing. The appellant also failed to establish that the absence of handrails was negligent or causative of the accident.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']