Martin v Purnell [1999] FCA 872
The Federal Court held that the appeal against the Supreme Court’s judgment was incompetent but declared the Magistrate’s orders for lump sum costs and restraining further process were made without power and are null and void, as such orders went beyond statutory authority.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment From Federal Court of Australia on Appeal From ACT Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; declaration of orders without power
- Legal Topics
- ['appeals From Magistrates Court' 'jurisdiction of Supreme Court' 'procedural Fairness' 'power of Magistrate to Amend Information' 'costs Orders' 'supervisory Jurisdiction' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment From Federal Court of Australia on Appeal From ACT Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether refusal of adjournment in Supreme Court resulted in procedural unfairness' 'Whether appeal to Supreme Court against dismissal of informations was competent' 'Whether Magistrate had power to make lump sum costs order and restrain further process' 'Whether Magistrate should have allowed amendment of informations']
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court held that the appeal against the Supreme Court’s judgment was incompetent but declared the Magistrate’s orders for lump sum costs and restraining further process were made without power and are null and void, as such orders went beyond statutory authority.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; declaration of orders without power
Orders
- ['Appeal against Supreme Court judgment in SCA 87 of 1998 dismissed' 'Appeal against Supreme Court judgment in SCA 92 of 1998 dismissed' 'Declaration that the Magistrates Court orders for payment of $7,380 costs and for no further process without leave were made without power and are null and void' 'All parties to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment