Martin v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 189
The orders for vexatious proceedings made against the appellant by the primary judge were set aside due to insufficient findings to satisfy the statutory requirements; the case must be remitted to the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court to properly resolve the Attorney General’s application, including the 'dual role' issue and factual findings on the definition of vexatious proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Remitter
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; previous orders set aside; proceedings remitted; costs to appellant.
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings' "attorney General's Role" 'remitter of Proceedings' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Remitter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the orders for vexatious proceedings made against the appellant should be set aside' 'Whether sufficient findings were made to satisfy s 8(1)(a) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW)' "Whether the Attorney General's 'dual role' was appropriately considered in bringing the application" 'If remitter is appropriate to resolve outstanding issues']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders for vexatious proceedings made against the appellant by the primary judge were set aside due to insufficient findings to satisfy the statutory requirements; the case must be remitted to the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court to properly resolve the Attorney General’s application, including the 'dual role' issue and factual findings on the definition of vexatious proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; previous orders set aside; proceedings remitted; costs to appellant.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' 'The orders made by Hidden J on 5 March 2013 be set aside.' 'Remit the proceedings to the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court for hearing and determination in accordance with law.' "The Attorney General pay the Appellant's costs of the proceedings to date, including costs in this Court and in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment