Martin v NSW Minister for Mineral and Forest Resources [2011] NSWLEC 38
The applicant's proceedings were not brought in the public interest but to vindicate private interests, and his conduct, including unreasonable pursuit of meritless points and abandonment of merits review, justified applying the usual rule that costs follow the event.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Class 8 Proceedings (land and Environment Court) / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the proceedings before Dixon C and of the motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'public Interest Litigation' 'judicial Review' 'merits Review' 'mining Licences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 8 Proceedings (land and Environment Court) / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether usual rule that costs follow the event should apply' 'Whether the proceedings were brought in the public interest to justify deviation from usual costs rule']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's proceedings were not brought in the public interest but to vindicate private interests, and his conduct, including unreasonable pursuit of meritless points and abandonment of merits review, justified applying the usual rule that costs follow the event.
Court Disposition
Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the proceedings before Dixon C and of the motion.
Orders
- ['Anthony Gilbert Martin to pay the costs of the proceedings before Dixon C.' "Anthony Gilbert Martin to pay the respondent's costs of the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment