Martin v NSW Minister for Mineral and Forest Resources [2011] NSWLEC 38

Martin v NSW Minister for Mineral and Forest Resources [2011] NSWLEC 38

The applicant's proceedings were not brought in the public interest but to vindicate private interests, and his conduct, including unreasonable pursuit of meritless points and abandonment of merits review, justified applying the usual rule that costs follow the event.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Class 8 Proceedings (land and Environment Court) / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the proceedings before Dixon C and of the motion.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'public Interest Litigation' 'judicial Review' 'merits Review' 'mining Licences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 8 Proceedings (land and Environment Court) / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether usual rule that costs follow the event should apply' 'Whether the proceedings were brought in the public interest to justify deviation from usual costs rule']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's proceedings were not brought in the public interest but to vindicate private interests, and his conduct, including unreasonable pursuit of meritless points and abandonment of merits review, justified applying the usual rule that costs follow the event.

Court Disposition

Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the proceedings before Dixon C and of the motion.

Orders

  • ['Anthony Gilbert Martin to pay the costs of the proceedings before Dixon C.' "Anthony Gilbert Martin to pay the respondent's costs of the motion."]