Martin v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 108

Martin v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 108

The applications for summary judgment were refused because there were no relevant admissions beyond one licence and the matter was not appropriately advanced for summary determination. The stay and transfer were refused due to lack of power and connection, and the joinder of Tellus was refused because they were not a necessary party. Amendment of the summons was refused to avoid delay and the commencement of new proceedings within the existing matter.

Parties
Applicant: Anthony Gilbert Martin; Respondent: State of New South Wales; Party Applicant Sought to Join: Tellus Resources Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Existing Proceeding / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Selected prayers of the Notice of Motion dismissed.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Stay of Proceedings, Transfer of Proceedings, Joinder of Parties, Amendment of Pleadings
Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Stay of Proceedings Transfer of Proceedings Joinder of Parties Amendment of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Gilbert Martin

Applicant

State of New South Wales

Respondent

Tellus Resources Ltd

Party Applicant Sought to Join

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion in Existing Proceeding / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should be entered for the applicant
  2. 2 Whether a stay of proceedings should be granted pending other appeals
  3. 3 Whether the matter should be transferred to the Court of Appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applications for summary judgment were refused because there were no relevant admissions beyond one licence and the matter was not appropriately advanced for summary determination. The stay and transfer were refused due to lack of power and connection, and the joinder of Tellus was refused because they were not a necessary party. Amendment of the summons was refused to avoid delay and the commencement of new proceedings within the existing matter.

Court Disposition

Selected prayers of the Notice of Motion dismissed.

Orders

  • Prayers 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 11 of the Applicant's Notice of Motion filed on 13 May 2011 are dismissed.