Hammond v Arcimowicz [2015] NSWLEC 1490
The structural integrity of the tree's stem is sufficient and there is no present reason for removal; instead, regular professional arborist inspections and recommended works are necessary to reduce risk and protect both parties' interests.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application upheld; orders made for respondent to arrange regular arborist inspections and carry out recommended works.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage by Falling Branches' 'risk of Damage or Injury' 'orders for Tree Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's tree poses a risk of damage or injury such that removal or other orders are warranted under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006"]
Ratio Decidendi
The structural integrity of the tree's stem is sufficient and there is no present reason for removal; instead, regular professional arborist inspections and recommended works are necessary to reduce risk and protect both parties' interests.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; orders made for respondent to arrange regular arborist inspections and carry out recommended works.
Orders
- ['The respondent is to arrange and pay for biennial inspections of the Tree by a suitably qualified (minimum AQF Level 5) and experienced arborist, with written report and recommendations.' "Inspections are to be conducted in November every two years beginning November 2016; a copy of the arborist's report is to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment