HAY v HAY [1996] NSWCA 243
The trial judge failed to account for the genuine possibility of reduction in future earning capacity due to the appellant's injuries, specifically the ongoing disability in his clavicle and potential future arthritic change in his hip, which warranted an additional allowance for future economic loss. However, the appellant failed to provide evidence justifying a separate award for loss of business opportunity.
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Hay; Respondent: Mark Hay
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Personal Injury, Damages, Future Economic Loss, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Hay
Appellant
Mark Hay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to properly account for the appellant's future economic loss resulting from his injuries.
- 2 Whether damages ought to have been awarded for loss of business opportunity.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge failed to account for the genuine possibility of reduction in future earning capacity due to the appellant's injuries, specifically the ongoing disability in his clavicle and potential future arthritic change in his hip, which warranted an additional allowance for future economic loss. However, the appellant failed to provide evidence justifying a separate award for loss of business opportunity.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Set aside the judgment of Newman J of 15 March 1996.
- Award a lump sum of $25,000 for future economic loss in addition to $10,000 for future medical expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment