Hudson v Entsch [2005] FCA 557
The applicant, having been unsuccessful, should pay the first respondent's costs, as public interest alone does not justify depriving the successful respondent of costs. However, costs of and incidental to the preparation and filing of the defence are to be excluded given the procedural history.
- Parties
- Applicant: Anthony Joseph Hudson; First Respondent: The Honourable Warren Entsch MP; Second Respondent: Australian Electoral Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Electoral Dispute / Costs Decision After Substantive Proceeding
- Outcome
- Costs ordered against applicant, with qualification
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Public Interest Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Joseph Hudson
Applicant
The Honourable Warren Entsch MP
First Respondent
Australian Electoral Commission
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Electoral Dispute / Costs Decision After Substantive Proceeding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should pay the first respondent's costs of the proceedings
- 2 Impact of public interest considerations on costs orders
- 3 Appropriate basis for assessing costs (party-and-party versus indemnity)
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, having been unsuccessful, should pay the first respondent's costs, as public interest alone does not justify depriving the successful respondent of costs. However, costs of and incidental to the preparation and filing of the defence are to be excluded given the procedural history.
Court Disposition
Costs ordered against applicant, with qualification
Orders
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs on a party-and-party basis, including reserved costs, excluding the costs of and incidental to the preparation and filing of the defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment