PAOLA v OCE COPYING EQUIPMENT [1999] NSWCA 169

PAOLA v OCE COPYING EQUIPMENT [1999] NSWCA 169

The appeal was dismissed because the alleged ninety day consignment warranty did not become part of the guarantee as an objectively intended contractual term, there was in any event no breach because Condor OA Pty Limited did not stay within its credit terms, and the new construction point concerning the written guarantee was both untenable and precluded by principles preventing fresh issues on appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 May 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the District Court of New South Wales
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['construction of Document' 'guarantee Liability' 'consignment Terms' 'fresh Issues on Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the District Court of New South Wales

  1. 1 ['Whether statements about ninety days consignment terms became part of the contractual guarantee.' 'Whether the respondent breached the alleged term concerning ninety days consignment arrangements.' 'Whether the appellant could raise a new construction point on the written guarantee for the first time on appeal.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the alleged ninety day consignment warranty did not become part of the guarantee as an objectively intended contractual term, there was in any event no breach because Condor OA Pty Limited did not stay within its credit terms, and the new construction point concerning the written guarantee was both untenable and precluded by principles preventing fresh issues on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']