MULHALL v ROBERTS [1995] NSWCA 302
On the balance of facts, including the oral contract for indefinite hiring of the appellant's labour at a fixed daily rate, weekly payment, control exercised by the respondent, and the nature of the engagement, the proper characterisation was one of a contract of service (employment), entitling the appellant to compensation; thus, the primary judge's decision was set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Mulhall; Respondent: Brian Roberts
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Workers' Compensation Appeal / Appeal From Compensation Court to New South Wales Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed (by majority)
- Legal Topics
- Contract of Service, Independent Contractor, Characterisation of Employment Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Mulhall
Appellant
Brian Roberts
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal / Appeal From Compensation Court to New South Wales Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was a worker employed under a contract of service or an independent contractor
- 2 Whether the appellant was a deemed worker under Schedule 1, CL2(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of facts, including the oral contract for indefinite hiring of the appellant's labour at a fixed daily rate, weekly payment, control exercised by the respondent, and the nature of the engagement, the proper characterisation was one of a contract of service (employment), entitling the appellant to compensation; thus, the primary judge's decision was set aside.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed (by majority)
Orders
- Allow the appeal
- Set aside the award of the Compensation Court of New South Wales (Egan CCJ)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment