MULHALL v ROBERTS [1995] NSWCA 302

MULHALL v ROBERTS [1995] NSWCA 302

On the balance of facts, including the oral contract for indefinite hiring of the appellant's labour at a fixed daily rate, weekly payment, control exercised by the respondent, and the nature of the engagement, the proper characterisation was one of a contract of service (employment), entitling the appellant to compensation; thus, the primary judge's decision was set aside.

Parties
Appellant: Anthony Mulhall; Respondent: Brian Roberts
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 July 1995
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal / Appeal From Compensation Court to New South Wales Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed (by majority)
Legal Topics
Contract of Service, Independent Contractor, Characterisation of Employment Relationship

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Mulhall

Appellant

Brian Roberts

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Workers' Compensation Appeal / Appeal From Compensation Court to New South Wales Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was a worker employed under a contract of service or an independent contractor
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was a deemed worker under Schedule 1, CL2(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of facts, including the oral contract for indefinite hiring of the appellant's labour at a fixed daily rate, weekly payment, control exercised by the respondent, and the nature of the engagement, the proper characterisation was one of a contract of service (employment), entitling the appellant to compensation; thus, the primary judge's decision was set aside.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed (by majority)

Orders

  • Allow the appeal
  • Set aside the award of the Compensation Court of New South Wales (Egan CCJ)