Gill v Waverley Council [2020] NSWLEC 1552
The proposed modification is substantially the same as the original development, as it does not radically alter the consented building in height, bulk, scale, or use, and causes no adverse amenity or public interest impacts. The height exceedance is justified due to existing building non-compliance, does not worsen environmental amenity, and is consistent with the planning objectives.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Modification Application approved with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'development Consent' 'height Standards' 'environmental Amenity' 'public Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed modification is substantially the same as the original development consent under s 4.55(2)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the height exceedance and amenity impacts justify refusal of the modification' 'Whether the proposed modification is in the public interest']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification is substantially the same as the original development, as it does not radically alter the consented building in height, bulk, scale, or use, and causes no adverse amenity or public interest impacts. The height exceedance is justified due to existing building non-compliance, does not worsen environmental amenity, and is consistent with the planning objectives.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Modification Application approved with conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Modification Application DA324/1995/A seeking installation of two aluminium louvered pergolas with associated landscaping in existing planter boxes on a terrace roof on level 9, on Lot 54 SP 57072, also known as 54/107 MacPherson Street, Bronte is approved subject to conditions as modified...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment