Small v Phillips [2019] NSWCA 222
The Court found that Mrs Phillips lacks testamentary capacity, that Anthony Small is an appropriate applicant, and that the draft will substantially reflects Mrs Phillips’ likely intentions for disposing of her estate. The Court therefore proposes to authorise the making of a statutory will pursuant to the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), subject to short minutes of orders being provided by the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Hearing; Orders to Be Finalised
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; proposed orders for authorisation of statutory will, details to be finalised.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Wills' 'testamentary Capacity' 'disposition of Estate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Hearing; Orders to Be Finalised
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the court should make an order under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) for a statutory will for Millie Phillips' "Whether the draft will reflects Millie Phillips' wishes as to the disposition of her estate"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that Mrs Phillips lacks testamentary capacity, that Anthony Small is an appropriate applicant, and that the draft will substantially reflects Mrs Phillips’ likely intentions for disposing of her estate. The Court therefore proposes to authorise the making of a statutory will pursuant to the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), subject to short minutes of orders being provided by the parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; proposed orders for authorisation of statutory will, details to be finalised.
Orders
- ['Parties to bring in short minutes of orders, including a draft will, giving effect to the conclusions outlined.' 'Liberty to apply in the event of disagreement as to the proposed orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment