Anthony Robert Ramage Challenge Bank Limited [1995] IRCA 424

Anthony Robert Ramage Challenge Bank Limited [1995] IRCA 424

The State Act does not provide an adequate alternative remedy under s 170EB of the Commonwealth Act. The applicant was afforded procedural fairness as he had opportunity to respond to the allegations, and there was a valid reason for termination due to breach of trust and improper access to confidential information. The termination was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 August 1995
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 170 EA Industrial Relations Act 1988 (cth) / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['unlawful Termination' 'procedural Fairness' 'adequate Alternative Remedy' 'valid Reason for Termination']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 170 EA Industrial Relations Act 1988 (cth) / Final Judgment After Hearing

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant had an adequate alternative remedy under Western Australian law pursuant to s 170EB Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth)' 'Whether procedural fairness was afforded in the termination' 'Whether there was a valid reason for termination and whether termination was harsh, unjust or unreasonable']

Ratio Decidendi

The State Act does not provide an adequate alternative remedy under s 170EB of the Commonwealth Act. The applicant was afforded procedural fairness as he had opportunity to respond to the allegations, and there was a valid reason for termination due to breach of trust and improper access to confidential information. The termination was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']