R v Simpson [2000] NSWCCA 284
Given the unchallenged facts and the nature of the conduct, there was clear evidence supporting the conviction for manslaughter. The sentence imposed was within the permissible range and did not constitute error.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Appellant: Anthony Simpson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Manslaughter, Guilty Plea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Regina
Crown
Anthony Simpson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guilty plea and facts supported the conviction for manslaughter
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive
Ratio Decidendi
Given the unchallenged facts and the nature of the conduct, there was clear evidence supporting the conviction for manslaughter. The sentence imposed was within the permissible range and did not constitute error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment