Shaw v Insurance Australia Group Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2023] NSWSC 1273
The President’s delegate made an error of law in referring the medical assessment for review by failing to consider whether, on the agreed facts and evidence, there was reasonable cause to suspect material incorrectness in the assessment; in these circumstances, the referral was unreasonable as no reasonable decision-maker could have come to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['certiorari' 'medical Assessment' 'judicial Review' 'reasonableness' 'estoppel']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a medical dispute as required for referral under s 7.26 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW)' "Whether the President's delegate made an error of law or jurisdiction by referring the medical assessment for review" 'Whether the Commission’s decision was legally unreasonable' 'Whether NRMA should be estopped from seeking review after prior concession']
Ratio Decidendi
The President’s delegate made an error of law in referring the medical assessment for review by failing to consider whether, on the agreed facts and evidence, there was reasonable cause to suspect material incorrectness in the assessment; in these circumstances, the referral was unreasonable as no reasonable decision-maker could have come to it.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- ['An order in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision of the delegate of the President on 25 August 2022 in the application for review lodged by the first defendant in relation to the medical assessment of Dr Rosenthal of 17 June 2022.' 'Remit the aforesaid application for review to the second defendant to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment