Norkin v University of New England [2023] NSWCA 194
The University's collection of personal information for the purpose of pre-assessing visa eligibility under the Simplified Student Visa Framework was for a lawful purpose that was directly related to its function or activity of providing education to overseas students. A lawful purpose under s 8 does not require statutory authorisation provided the activity is not prohibited by law. The University complied with s 8 because collection was directly related to teaching international students, the function/activity of the University.
- Parties
- Applicant: Anton Norkin; First Respondent: The University of New England; Second Respondent – Submitting Appearance: Civil and Administrative Tribunal of NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal – Application for Leave to Appeal From Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Collection of Personal Information, Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (nsw), University Admissions, Simplified Student Visa Framework, Appeals, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anton Norkin
Applicant
The University of New England
First Respondent
Civil and Administrative Tribunal of NSW
Second Respondent – Submitting Appearance
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal – Application for Leave to Appeal From Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the collection of personal information by a university in the context of a pre-visa assessment under the Simplified Student Visa Framework complies with s 8 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the University's collection of personal information about an applicant and his sponsor was for a lawful purpose directly related to a function or activity of the University as required by s 8
- 3 Whether a lawful purpose for s 8 requires statutory authorisation or simply means not prohibited by law
Ratio Decidendi
The University's collection of personal information for the purpose of pre-assessing visa eligibility under the Simplified Student Visa Framework was for a lawful purpose that was directly related to its function or activity of providing education to overseas students. A lawful purpose under s 8 does not require statutory authorisation provided the activity is not prohibited by law. The University complied with s 8 because collection was directly related to teaching international students, the function/activity of the University.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Either party may apply within 14 days for orders as to costs by filing and serving short submissions not exceeding three pages; response within seven days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment