Pascale -v- Lucas (GD) [2000] NSWADTAP 29

Pascale -v- Lucas (GD) [2000] NSWADTAP 29

The original proceedings were not validly constituted, causing costs to be wasted in the appeal proceedings, and there was doubt whether the ordinary Suitors' Fund Act provisions applied. Because the situation was within the spirit and intent of those provisions and s 6C was the most applicable provision, the Panel recommended payment from the Fund for the appellant's legal costs incurred in respect of the hearings on 16 May 2000 and 19 June 2000.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2000
Procedural Posture
Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Application / Appeal Panel Decision on Item 5 of Directions Given on 19 June 2000 Concerning Costs and a Suitors' Fund Act Certificate
Outcome
Recommendation for payment from the Fund pursuant to s 6C of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951.
Legal Topics
["suitors' Fund Act Certificate" 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'invalid Constitution of Tribunal Proceedings' 'remittal for Original Determination']
['administrative Law' 'costs'] ["suitors' Fund Act Certificate" 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'invalid Constitution of Tribunal Proceedings' 'remittal for Original Determination']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Application / Appeal Panel Decision on Item 5 of Directions Given on 19 June 2000 Concerning Costs and a Suitors' Fund Act Certificate

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Administrative Decisions Tribunal is a 'court' for the purposes of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951." "Whether costs incurred by the appellant in relation to the hearings on 16 May 2000 and 19 June 2000 should be the subject of a recommendation for payment from the Suitors' Fund." "Whether s 6C of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 was the applicable provision where the original proceedings were not validly constituted and the usual certificate provisions were doubtful."]

Ratio Decidendi

The original proceedings were not validly constituted, causing costs to be wasted in the appeal proceedings, and there was doubt whether the ordinary Suitors' Fund Act provisions applied. Because the situation was within the spirit and intent of those provisions and s 6C was the most applicable provision, the Panel recommended payment from the Fund for the appellant's legal costs incurred in respect of the hearings on 16 May 2000 and 19 June 2000.

Court Disposition

Recommendation for payment from the Fund pursuant to s 6C of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951.

Orders

  • ['The decision of 13 March 2000 is set aside because of an invalidity as to constitution of the Division, without any consideration being given to the substance of the decision.' 'The Panel recommends that there be a payment out of the Fund pursuant to s 6C in respect of the legal costs incurred by the appellant in...