Papoutsakis v Tsiakis [2025] NSWSC 35

Papoutsakis v Tsiakis [2025] NSWSC 35

The plaintiff, as an undischarged bankrupt, has no standing to bring the proceedings as the causes of action are vested in the trustee. The claim does not fall within the s 116(2)(g) exception because the alleged personal injury stems from the bankruptcy itself, which is not an excepted category. No other statutory exception applies, rendering the proceedings untenable and an abuse of the process of the court.

Parties
Plaintiff: Antonios Papoutsakis; First Defendant: Paul Scanlon; Second Defendant: Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Steven Tsiakis
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Dismissal Application
Outcome
Proceedings summarily dismissed against the third defendant; costs awarded against plaintiff
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Standing of Bankrupt Litigant, Exception to Vesting of Causes of Action in Trustee
Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Summary Dismissal Standing of Bankrupt Litigant Exception to Vesting of Causes of Action in Trustee

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Antonios Papoutsakis

Plaintiff

Paul Scanlon

First Defendant

Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd

Second Defendant

Steven Tsiakis

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Summary Dismissal Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an undischarged bankrupt has standing to maintain proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the claim falls under the s 116(2)(g) Bankruptcy Act exception for personal injuries
  3. 3 Whether exceptions under ss 60 and 265 of the Bankruptcy Act apply

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff, as an undischarged bankrupt, has no standing to bring the proceedings as the causes of action are vested in the trustee. The claim does not fall within the s 116(2)(g) exception because the alleged personal injury stems from the bankruptcy itself, which is not an excepted category. No other statutory exception applies, rendering the proceedings untenable and an abuse of the process of the court.

Court Disposition

Proceedings summarily dismissed against the third defendant; costs awarded against plaintiff

Orders

  • The proceedings are summarily dismissed against the third defendant.
  • The plaintiff is to pay the third defendant's costs of the proceedings and of the notice of motion.