Borg v de Vries (Trustee), in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of David Morton Bertram [2018] FCA 2116
Replacement of trustees is appropriate where original trustees believe no further investigations warranted or practical, yet there appear unresolved matters needing investigation, new trustee is willing and funded, and removal would advance the purposes of the Bankruptcy Act in administration of the estate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Replacement of Trustee in Bankruptcy / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Trustees removed; new trustee appointed.
- Legal Topics
- ['replacement of Trustee' 'administration of Bankruptcy Estate' 'creditor Standing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Replacement of Trustee in Bankruptcy / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether trustees should be removed and replaced under s 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Bankruptcy)' 'Whether further investigations into bankrupt estate are warranted']
Ratio Decidendi
Replacement of trustees is appropriate where original trustees believe no further investigations warranted or practical, yet there appear unresolved matters needing investigation, new trustee is willing and funded, and removal would advance the purposes of the Bankruptcy Act in administration of the estate.
Court Disposition
Trustees removed; new trustee appointed.
Orders
- ['The Respondents cease to be the trustees of bankrupt estate of David Morton Bertram.' 'Robert William Naudi be appointed trustee of bankrupt estate of David Morton Bertram.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment