Antony & Wendy Tisch v North Sydney Council [2018] NSWLEC 1044
An agreement was reached under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to the terms of a decision acceptable to the parties, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the Court could have made the decision in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore, the proceedings were disposed of by making orders in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Decision and Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'court Act S34(3)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Decision and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the development application should be approved in accordance with agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement was reached under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to the terms of a decision acceptable to the parties, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the Court could have made the decision in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore, the proceedings were disposed of by making orders in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The applicant be granted leave to rely on amended plans: Drawing numbered 15J dated January 2018 by David Liddy & Associates Pty Ltd received 29 January 2018; Drawing numbered 20 dated January 2018 by Australian Plantscapes received 29 January 2018.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No 252/09/8 for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment