Antoon Frans Broers v Australian Co-Operative Foods Limited and ors [2008] NSWDDT 38
Clause 52(1) of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007 is procedural only, binds defendants as to apportionment for cross-claim purposes, and does not operate to preclude a defendant from contesting liability to the plaintiff in the primary proceedings; defenses cannot be struck out solely due to a contributions assessment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['apportionment' 'notice of Motion' 'striking Out Defences' 'dust Diseases']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether paragraphs in defence denying liability should be struck out under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r14.28(1) given the contribution assessment under Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007, clause 52(1)']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 52(1) of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007 is procedural only, binds defendants as to apportionment for cross-claim purposes, and does not operate to preclude a defendant from contesting liability to the plaintiff in the primary proceedings; defenses cannot be struck out solely due to a contributions assessment.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's motion of 24 November 2008 is dismissed." 'Plaintiff to pay the costs of Wallaby Grip Ltd, Wallaby Grip (BAE) Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Amaca Pty Ltd.' 'Liberty to the other defendants to apply in respect of costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment