BROOKES v ANZ BANKING GROUP LIMITED [1996] NSWCA 69
The Court permits forensic examination of the questioned diary note on strict terms, given the applicant's allegation of alteration and the relevance of the document to prior proceedings.
- Parties
- Applicants: Mr and Mrs Brookes; Respondent: ANZ Banking Group Limited; Other: Mr McCormack; Other: Detective McCann; Other: Mr and Mrs Marshall
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Application for Forensic Examination; Interlocutory
- Outcome
- matter adjourned; leave granted to seek forensic examination upon filing appropriate affidavit
- Legal Topics
- Forensic Examination of Documents, Allegation of Document Alteration, Post Settlement Procedural Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr and Mrs Brookes
Applicants
ANZ Banking Group Limited
Respondent
Mr McCormack
Other
Detective McCann
Other
Mr and Mrs Marshall
Other
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application for Forensic Examination; Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted for forensic examination of diary notes alleged to be altered
- 2 Whether alleged falsity of documentary evidence affected previous settlement and findings
Ratio Decidendi
The Court permits forensic examination of the questioned diary note on strict terms, given the applicant's allegation of alteration and the relevance of the document to prior proceedings.
Court Disposition
matter adjourned; leave granted to seek forensic examination upon filing appropriate affidavit
Orders
- Matter adjourned to 19 April, 1996 to allow filing of affidavit as to nature of forensic examination.
- Affidavit detailing testing process and safeguards to be filed by 12 April, 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment