AOA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 697
The Minister had not made a migration decision under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) reviewable by the Federal Circuit Court. The detailed minute concerning s 48B was expressly not a referral to the Minister for consideration under s 48B, and the Minister did not consider the s 48B request. At most, any decision was a decision not to consider exercising a non-compellable power, which was not reviewable by the Federal Circuit Court. The Federal Circuit Court decision was therefore not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant leave.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From an Interlocutory Judgment of the Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['ministerial Intervention' 'non Compellable Powers' 'federal Circuit Court Jurisdiction' 'leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From an Interlocutory Judgment of the Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's interlocutory judgment." "Whether the Federal Circuit Court had jurisdiction to review the result of the applicant's request for Ministerial intervention under s 48B of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." "Whether the Minister made a migration decision under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in relation to the applicant's s 48B request." 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court decision was attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister had not made a migration decision under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) reviewable by the Federal Circuit Court. The detailed minute concerning s 48B was expressly not a referral to the Minister for consideration under s 48B, and the Minister did not consider the s 48B request. At most, any decision was a decision not to consider exercising a non-compellable power, which was not reviewable by the Federal Circuit Court. The Federal Circuit Court decision was therefore not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant leave.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment