Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd [2021] NSWCA 166

Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd [2021] NSWCA 166

There was no jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record in the District Court’s determination that the review panel gave adequate reasons for its cost determinations, including the adoption of a global approach. The review panel was not required to conduct a line by line assessment of the applicants’ assessment process costs and sufficiently explained its methodology and reasoning.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Summons dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'costs Assessment' 'professional Negligence' 'error of Law on the Face of the Record' 'jurisdictional Error']
['administrative Law' 'costs'] ['judicial Review' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'costs Assessment' 'professional Negligence' 'error of Law on the Face of the Record' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether there was jurisdictional error in the District Court's determination regarding adequacy of reasons by the review panel." "Whether there was error of law on the face of the record concerning the adequacy of reasons for the review panel's cost determinations." "Whether the review panel was required to undertake a line by line assessment of the applicants' costs incurred in the assessment process."]

Ratio Decidendi

There was no jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record in the District Court’s determination that the review panel gave adequate reasons for its cost determinations, including the adoption of a global approach. The review panel was not required to conduct a line by line assessment of the applicants’ assessment process costs and sufficiently explained its methodology and reasoning.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Dismiss the summons filed 3 August 2020 with costs.']