AOX17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 397
The appeal must be dismissed because no jurisdictional error by the Immigration Assessment Authority was established: the Authority was entitled to conclude that the appellant could reasonably relocate within Sri Lanka to avoid the risk of harm, and its factual findings (even if incorrect) did not constitute jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs (excluding costs of producing appeal book)
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugee Status' 'complementary Protection' 'internal Relocation' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority committed jurisdictional error in upholding refusal of a protection visa' 'Whether the Authority failed to consider internal relocation appropriately' 'Whether the Authority failed to accord procedural fairness' 'Whether risk of harm amounted to significant harm under Migration Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal must be dismissed because no jurisdictional error by the Immigration Assessment Authority was established: the Authority was entitled to conclude that the appellant could reasonably relocate within Sri Lanka to avoid the risk of harm, and its factual findings (even if incorrect) did not constitute jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs (excluding costs of producing appeal book)
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs except the costs of producing the appeal book."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment